Global Compliance for AI and Data Privacy made simple

31
Jurisdictions Covered
25+
Major Regulations
90%
Market Coverage by Value

Global Data Protection and AI Compliance Coverage

TalentMatched.com achieves enterprise-grade security and compliance through a strategic partnership with Amazon Web Services. We inherit comprehensive infrastructure-level controls including ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and GDPR compliance frameworks from AWS's 143+ certified security standards. We enhance this foundational infrastructure security with our proprietary application-level controls including universal multi-factor authentication, role-based access management, automated audit trail generation, and comprehensive data classification protocols. This approach creates a defense-in-depth security architecture that meets the most stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining operational efficiency. We leverage AWS's proven infrastructure security investments while implementing specialized controls for recruitment data processing. This ensures complete compliance coverage through the shared responsibility model where AWS secures the underlying infrastructure and TalentMatched.com manages application security, data protection, and regulatory compliance obligations.

Data Security

23 Security Controls

Data Security Capabilities

  • AES-256 encryption for all stored data
  • TLS 1.3 encryption for all communications
  • Hardware security modules (HSMs) integration
  • End-to-end encryption for sensitive data flows
  • Memory encryption preventing data exposure
  • Database-level encryption with transparent data encryption (TDE)
  • Universal multi-factor authentication requirements
  • Role-based access controls with minimum privileges
  • Zero-trust security model implementation
  • VPN protection for all remote access
  • Quarterly permission reviews and automatic expiration
  • Hardware token support (FIDO2/WebAuthn)
  • Defense-in-depth security architecture
  • Network segmentation isolating sensitive data
  • Advanced threat detection and response systems
  • Perimeter defense with NGFW deployment
  • Intrusion detection and prevention systems
  • Web application firewall with AI threat detection
  • DDoS protection and mitigation
  • 24/7 security operations center monitoring
  • Advanced threat analytics with machine learning
  • User behavior analytics (UEBA) implementation
  • Automated incident response orchestration

Data Privacy

18 Privacy Controls

Data Privacy Capabilities

  • Comprehensive GDPR compliance as foundational standard
  • EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework certification
  • Privacy by design implementation in system architecture
  • Data minimization and purpose limitation enforcement
  • Pseudonymization where applicable
  • Automated privacy compliance validation in deployment
  • Universal candidate portal for global rights management
  • Right of access with complete application history viewing
  • Right to rectification with self-service profile updates
  • Right to erasure with complete profile deletion capability
  • Right to data portability with structured exports
  • Right to object with automated processing opt-out
  • Consent tracking with detailed records and timestamps
  • Consent withdrawal mechanisms with immediate processing cessation
  • Granular consent and privacy controls
  • Privacy policy synchronization with application functionality
  • Enhanced consent mechanisms for AI processing
  • Multi-language support and localization

Data Protection

16 Protection Mechanisms

Data Protection Capabilities

  • Four-tier data classification system (Public, Internal, Confidential, Restricted)
  • Automatic Restricted classification for all recruitment data
  • Consistent high-level protection for all personal information
  • Automated data classification and tagging
  • Regional data residency controls
  • Cross-border data protection with automated adequacy verification
  • Standard Contractual Clauses pre-approved implementation
  • Transfer impact assessments for international operations
  • Data location transparency for all processing activities
  • Automated retention policies with purpose-based deletion
  • Secure data destruction procedures
  • Backup data encryption and secure disposal
  • Immutable backup protection against ransomware
  • Patent-protected SBVE data processing security
  • Encrypted vector calculations preventing exposure
  • Secure multi-tenant architecture protection

Incident Response

14 Response Procedures

Incident Response Capabilities

  • 24/7 incident response team availability
  • Defined escalation procedures with documented timelines
  • External cybersecurity expert partnerships
  • Legal and regulatory notification protocols
  • Technical Security Contact coordination
  • Level 4 Critical: Immediate response
  • Level 3 High Impact: Response within 1 hour
  • Level 2 Medium Impact: Response within 2 hours
  • Level 1 Low Impact: Response within 4 hours
  • 72-hour breach notification compliance
  • Comprehensive incident assessment procedures
  • Priority response for all personal data incidents
  • Automated regulatory notification workflows
  • Post-incident analysis and improvement protocols

Business Continuity

11 Continuity Controls

Business Continuity Capabilities

  • Real-time data replication across multiple regions
  • Automated failover and recovery procedures
  • Recovery time objective (RTO) of less than 4 hours
  • Recovery point objective (RPO) of less than 15 minutes
  • Regular disaster recovery testing and validation
  • Automated daily backups with encryption
  • Geographically distributed backup storage
  • Point-in-time recovery capabilities
  • Regular backup restoration testing
  • Distributed operational model with inherent resilience
  • Essential function maintenance during extended outages

Regulatory Compliance

19 Compliance Controls

Regulatory Compliance Capabilities

  • Real-time compliance status monitoring
  • Automated privacy compliance validation in deployment
  • Policy violation detection and alerting
  • Compliance dashboard with automated reporting
  • Regular compliance scanning with remediation recommendations
  • GDPR comprehensive compliance framework
  • EU AI Act alignment with CE marking preparation
  • US state law compliance (CPRA, VCDVA, CPA)
  • International framework coverage (PIPEDA, Privacy Act, LGPD)
  • Industry-specific compliance standards adherence
  • Annual third-party security assessments
  • Quarterly internal compliance reviews
  • SOC 2 Type II certification maintenance
  • ISO 27001 compliance framework implementation
  • Comprehensive documentation for regulatory inquiries
  • Continuous audit readiness with evidence collection
  • Audit trail generation and maintenance
  • Regulatory reporting automation
  • External audit coordination and support

AI Ethics & Governance

15 AI Controls

AI Ethics & Governance Capabilities

  • Patent-protected Symmetrical Vector Bias Engine (SBVE)
  • Mathematical bias neutrality through symmetrical processing
  • Protected characteristic exclusion from vectors
  • Bias effects cancellation through identical processing
  • Mathematical proof of fairness generation
  • Real-time bias detection across protected characteristics
  • Continuous validation of neutral outcomes
  • Every decision tracked for bias indicators
  • Immediate alerts for statistical anomalies
  • Automated bias auditing replacing manual processes
  • Intelligent escalation system for ambiguous cases
  • Human intervention available on-demand for any decision
  • Meaningful human oversight without efficiency loss
  • Complete audit trail of human involvement
  • Transparent decision logic documentation

Vendor Risk Management

9 Risk Controls

Vendor Risk Management Capabilities

  • Comprehensive security assessments for all data processing vendors
  • Signed data processing agreements with security requirements
  • Security requirements scaled to data sensitivity levels
  • Annual vendor security updates and reviews
  • Third-party security validation and documentation
  • Continuous vendor security monitoring
  • Immediate notification requirements for security incidents
  • Development and operational partner security standards
  • Contractual protections for intellectual property and customer data

Book a no-obligation call to discuss your compliance needs.

Book a Call

31 jurisdictions. 25+ major regulations. One platform

European Union

GDPR Article 22, EU AI Act Articles 9-15, CE Marking Requirements

✅ COMPLIANT

EU Compliance Framework

  • GDPR Article 22(1): Two-tier processing eliminates automated decision-making exposure
  • GDPR Article 22(3): Human intervention capability implemented for all candidate decisions
  • EU AI Act Article 9: Risk management system with continuous bias monitoring
  • EU AI Act Article 11: Technical documentation with SBVE methodology
  • EU AI Act Article 14: Human oversight with meaningful intervention capability
  • EU AI Act Article 48: CE marking compliance preparation (effective August 2026)
  • GDPR Articles 13-14: Enhanced transparency through candidate portal

United States

NYC Law 144, CPRA § 1798.100, VCDPA § 59.1-578, CPA § 6-1-1306

✅ COMPLIANT

US Multi-State Compliance

  • NYC Local Law 144 § 20-871: Monthly bias audits exceed annual requirements
  • NYC Local Law 144 § 20-871(b)(1): Public posting of audit methodology and results
  • CPRA § 1798.100(b): Employee privacy notices at data collection
  • CPRA § 1798.125: Non-retaliation protections for data subject rights
  • VCDPA § 59.1-578: Automated decision-making opt-out rights implemented
  • CPA § 6-1-1306(1)(a)(IV): Profiling opt-out with human review alternative
  • CTDPA § 42-515(a)(4): Consumer opt-out rights for automated profiling
  • FCRA § 615: Adverse action procedures with detailed explanations
  • Title VII: Job-relatedness validation through SBVE bias neutrality

United Kingdom

UK GDPR Article 22, DPA 2018 Schedule 2, ICO AI Guidance

✅ COMPLIANT

UK Data Protection Framework

  • UK GDPR Article 22: Two-tier processing avoids solely automated decisions
  • DPA 2018 Schedule 2 Part 1: Lawful basis for employment processing
  • ICO AI Guidance 2024: Human oversight with meaningful intervention
  • UK GDPR Article 35: DPIA automation for high-risk AI processing
  • DPA 2018 Section 14: Enhanced transparency for automated processing

Canada

PIPEDA Schedule 1, Quebec Law 25 § 12, Bill C-27 Readiness

✅ COMPLIANT

Canadian Privacy Compliance

  • PIPEDA Principle 4.9: Challenge procedures for automated decisions implemented
  • PIPEDA Section 7(3)(h.1): Cross-border processing disclosure in candidate portal
  • PIPEDA Principle 4.1.3: Accountability through algorithmic impact assessments
  • Quebec Law 25 § 12: Consent withdrawal mechanisms in candidate portal
  • Bill C-27 (AIDA) Readiness: Impact assessment framework preparation

Australia

Privacy Act 1988 APP 1.2, APP 6, Automated Decision Guidelines

✅ COMPLIANT

Australian Privacy Principles Compliance

  • APP 1.2: Regular bias audits for AI recruitment systems
  • APP 6: Use limitation ensuring recruitment purpose compliance
  • APP 8: Cross-border disclosure notifications in candidate portal
  • APP 12: Access and correction rights through candidate portal
  • December 2026 Requirements: Automated decision transparency preparation

Brazil

LGPD Articles 6, 18, 20, ANPD Technical Note 1/2022

✅ COMPLIANT

LGPD Data Protection Compliance

  • LGPD Article 6: Ten processing principles including accountability
  • LGPD Article 18: Nine data subject rights automated fulfillment
  • LGPD Article 20: Human review rights for automated decision-making
  • LGPD Article 33: International transfer adequacy verification
  • ANPD Technical Note 1/2022: AI transparency requirements met

Japan

APPI Articles 15-22, AI Governance Guidelines 2021

✅ COMPLIANT

Japanese Data Protection Framework

  • APPI Article 18: Purpose limitation for recruitment data processing
  • APPI Article 24: Cross-border transfer notification requirements
  • AI Governance Guidelines 2021: Voluntary framework flexibility

Singapore

PDPA Sections 13-26, Model AI Governance Framework 2.0

✅ COMPLIANT

Singapore Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPA Section 13: Enhanced consent mechanisms for AI processing
  • PDPA Section 26: Transfer limitation with adequate safeguards
  • PDPA Section 22: Access and correction rights automation
  • Model AI Governance Framework 2.0: Risk management alignment
  • AI Verify Foundation: Participation eligibility maintained

South Korea

PIPA Article 37-2, Employment Protection Act, AI Ethics Standards

✅ COMPLIANT

Korean Privacy and Employment Compliance

  • PIPA Article 37-2: Published algorithm methodology satisfies transparency
  • PIPA Article 22: Consent management and withdrawal rights
  • Employment Protection Act: Human oversight for employment decisions
  • AI Ethics Standards: National AI Ethics Committee alignment

Mexico

LFPDPPP Articles 6-8, INAI Guidelines, ARCO Rights

✅ COMPLIANT

Mexican Data Protection Framework

  • LFPDPPP Article 6: Consent-based processing framework
  • LFPDPPP Article 8: Privacy notice requirements automation
  • ARCO Rights: Access, Rectification, Cancellation, Opposition through portal
  • INAI Guidelines: Employment data protection compliance

Argentina

PDPA Law 25.326, EU Adequacy Decision 2019/419

✅ COMPLIANT

Argentine Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPA Law 25.326: GDPR-aligned data protection framework
  • EU Adequacy Decision 2019/419: Cross-border transfer facilitation
  • Article 43 Constitution: Habeas data rights implementation

United Arab Emirates

DIFC Data Protection Law 2020, Federal Decree-Law 45/2021

✅ COMPLIANT

UAE Data Protection Framework

  • DIFC Law 2020 Article 22: Human review requirements satisfied
  • Federal Decree-Law 45/2021: Federal data protection alignment

Switzerland

FADP Articles 21-22, EU Adequacy Decision 2000/518/EC

✅ COMPLIANT

Swiss Data Protection Compliance

  • FADP Article 21: Automated decision-making restrictions compliance
  • FADP Article 22: Information and access rights automation
  • EU Adequacy Decision 2000/518/EC: Cross-border transfer benefits

New Zealand

Privacy Act 2020 Section 22, Information Privacy Principles 1-13

✅ COMPLIANT

New Zealand Privacy Compliance

  • IPP 1: Collection limitation and purpose specification
  • IPP 6: Access to personal information rights
  • IPP 7: Correction of personal information rights
  • IPP 11: Limits on disclosure including overseas transfers
  • Privacy Act 2020 Section 96: Breach notification procedures

Thailand

PDPA 2019 Sections 19-34, Royal Decree on Data Transfer

✅ COMPLIANT

Thai Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPA Section 19: Consent collection and withdrawal mechanisms
  • PDPA Section 28: Data subject rights through candidate portal
  • PDPA Section 26: Cross-border transfer adequacy assessment

Chile

Law 19.628 Articles 4-12, Constitutional Article 19 No. 4

✅ COMPLIANT

Chilean Privacy Framework

  • Law 19.628 Article 4: Consent requirements for data processing
  • Law 19.628 Article 12: Access and correction rights
  • Constitutional Article 19 No. 4: Privacy rights protection

South Africa

POPIA Sections 8-69, Eight Processing Conditions

✅ COMPLIANT

POPIA Processing Conditions Compliance

  • Section 8: Accountability through Information Officer oversight
  • Section 9: Processing limitation with lawful basis
  • Section 10: Purpose specification and limitation
  • Section 13: Information quality and accuracy
  • Section 14: Security safeguards implementation
  • Section 18: Data subject participation rights
  • Section 72: Cross-border transfer adequate protection

Israel

Privacy Protection Law 1981, EU Adequacy Decision 2011/61/EU

✅ COMPLIANT

Israeli Privacy Compliance

  • Privacy Protection Law Section 7: Data subject access rights
  • EU Adequacy Decision 2011/61/EU: Cross-border transfer facilitation

Saudi Arabia

PDPL 2021, SDAIA Registration Requirements, Vision 2030

✅ COMPLIANT

Saudi Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPL Article 6: Data subject rights automation
  • SDAIA Registration: Handled by TalentMatched.com
  • Data Localization: Segmentation for residency requirements
  • Vision 2030 AI Framework: Strategic alignment

Indonesia

UU PDP No. 27/2022, Minister Regulation 20/2016

✅ COMPLIANT

Indonesian Data Protection Compliance

  • UU PDP Article 8: Consent collection and withdrawal
  • UU PDP Article 35: Data localization readiness
  • Minister Regulation 20/2016: Electronic system compliance

Malaysia

PDPA 2010 Sections 6-11, DPP General Principles

✅ COMPLIANT

Malaysian Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPA 2010 Section 6: General principle of consent
  • PDPA 2010 Section 7: Notice and choice principle
  • PDPA 2010 Section 30: Access rights implementation

Philippines

DPA 2012, NPC Circular 16-03, Automated Decision Guidelines

✅ COMPLIANT

Philippine Data Privacy Compliance

  • DPA 2012 Section 16: Data subject rights automation
  • NPC Circular 16-03: Consent and notification requirements
  • Automated Decision Guidelines: Human oversight safeguards

Vietnam

Decree 13/2023, Cybersecurity Law 2018, Circular 47/2020

✅ COMPLIANT

Vietnamese Data Protection Compliance

  • Decree 13/2023 Article 8: Personal data processing principles
  • Cybersecurity Law 2018 Article 26: Data localization readiness
  • Circular 47/2020: Consent management requirements

Nigeria

NDPA 2023, NDPR 2019, NDPC Registration Requirements

✅ COMPLIANT

Nigerian Data Protection Compliance

  • NDPR 2019 Section 2.4: Data subject rights implementation
  • NDPR 2019 Section 2.5: Consent and lawful basis requirements
  • NDPC Registration: Handled by TalentMatched.com
  • NDPA 2023: Enhanced data protection framework alignment
  • Monthly bias audits: Exceed NDPR annual requirements

Egypt

PDPL 2020, Data Protection Authority Decree 2021

✅ COMPLIANT

Egyptian Data Protection Compliance

  • PDPL 2020 Article 5: Data subject consent requirements
  • PDPL 2020 Article 7: Data subject rights implementation

India

DPDP Act 2023 Sections 6-8, Consent Manager Framework

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • DPDP Act Section 7: API integration with SEBI-registered Consent Manager platforms
  • DPDP Act Section 18: Register as Significant Data Fiduciary if processing >1M users
  • DPDP Act Section 6: Complete compliance assessment with Data Protection Board

Kenya

DPA 2019 Sections 25-31, ODPC Registration Requirements

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • DPA 2019 Section 25: Complete mandatory ODPC registration as data controller
  • DPA 2019 Section 48: Establish ODPC approval workflow for cross-border transfers
  • DPA 2019 Section 49: Document adequate safeguards for each transfer destination

Turkey

KVKK Law 6698, VERBIS Registry Requirements

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • KVKK Article 16: Submit notification for each data processing activity
  • VERBIS Registry: Complete Personal Data Controllers registration within 30 days

Colombia

Law 1581/2012, RNBD Registry, Decree 1377/2013

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • Law 1581 Article 25: Complete National Registry of Databases (RNBD) registration
  • Decree 1377 Article 26: Conduct privacy impact assessments for automated decisions
  • Law 1581 Article 15: Implement enhanced consent withdrawal mechanisms

Peru

Law 29733/2011, ANPD Resolution 033-2021

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • ANPD Resolution 033-2021: Obtain prior approval for automated employment decisions
  • Law 29733 Article 37: Complete National Registry registration
  • Submit approval request 30 days before automated processing deployment

United States (Biometric Data)

Illinois BIPA 740 ILCS 14/15, California SB 1001

⚠️ PRODUCT COMPLIANT

Required Actions for Full Compliance

  • Illinois BIPA 740 ILCS 14/15: Implement written consent for voice biometric processing
  • California SB 1001 Civil Code § 1798.99: Deploy bot disclosure ("AI:" prefix) for automated communications

China

PIPL Articles 38-44, Cybersecurity Law Article 37, Algorithm Regulation

❌ NON-COMPLIANT

Insurmountable Compliance Barriers

  • Algorithm Regulation Article 8: CAC registration within 10 days of deployment
  • PIPL Article 40: Mandatory data localization for Chinese residents
  • Cybersecurity Law Article 37: Security assessment for transfers >100,000 individuals
  • Algorithm Regulation Article 12: Potential source code disclosure requirement

Russia

Federal Law 152-FZ Article 18, Data Localization Law 242-FZ

❌ NON-COMPLIANT

Sanctions and Compliance Barriers

  • International sanctions restrictions per Executive Order 14024
  • Federal Law 242-FZ: Mandatory data localization requirements
  • Roskomnadzor registration requirements under Federal Law 152-FZ

Iran

Computer Crime Law 2009, Data Protection Regulations 2020

❌ NON-COMPLIANT

International Sanctions Barriers

  • US sanctions per Executive Order 13846 restrict technology services
  • EU sanctions per Council Regulation 267/2012 prohibit technology transfer
  • Payment processing restrictions under SWIFT exclusion

North Korea

Computer Program Protection Law 2003

❌ NON-COMPLIANT

Complete Sanctions Barriers

  • UN Security Council Resolution 2397: Comprehensive sanctions prohibit all commercial technology services
  • US Executive Order 13722: Complete prohibition on business relationships

Book a no-obligation call to discuss your compliance needs.

Book a Call

Revolutionary Legal Framework

Patent-protected two-tier processing eliminates 80% of Article 22 exposure through groundbreaking applicant vs candidate distinction

▼

The Compliance Problem

Traditional platforms treat every application as a "candidate." This triggers complex regulations for obviously unqualified applicants.

Automated rejection of legitimate candidates violates GDPR Article 22. Penalties reach €20 million.

Industry response: expensive human review of unqualified applicants. Slow. Inefficient. Still risky.

TalentMatched Breakthrough

Revolutionary two-tier legal framework distinguishes applicants from candidates.

Tier 1: Administrative eligibility checking. Not subject to Article 22.

Tier 2: Human-assisted candidate evaluation. Full regulatory compliance.

Result: 80% faster processing. Zero compliance risk. Complete legal protection.

GDPR Article 22 Protection

  • Tier 1: Administrative process, not Article 22 decision-making
  • Tier 2: Human oversight for all candidate decisions
  • Clear distinction: Eligibility vs. selection
  • Legitimate interest for capability assessment
  • Mathematical proof of bias neutrality

EU AI Act Alignment

  • Risk management throughout AI lifecycle
  • Human oversight for automated decisions
  • Technical documentation and audit trails
  • CE marking compliance for EU operations
  • Conformity assessment procedures

US State Law Compliance

  • NYC Local Law 144: Automated bias audits
  • California CPRA: Employee privacy notices
  • Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Florida coverage
  • Transparency and opt-out rights
  • Impact assessment automation

Technical Implementation

  • SBVE qualification assessment engine
  • Objective job-related criteria only
  • Mathematical bias neutrality verification
  • Transparent decision logic documentation
  • Audit-resistant processing architecture

80% Processing Acceleration

Immediate disqualification of unfit applicants. Focused human attention on viable candidates. Streamlined workflow optimization.

Risk Elimination

80% of processing exempt from Article 22. Clear regulatory framework defense. Reduced litigation exposure.

Market Differentiation

Only platform with sophisticated legal framework. Patent-protected technology implementation. Regulatory innovation leadership.

Automated Bias Auditing

Continuous bias auditing replacing expensive manual audits with mathematical proof of fairness

▼

Traditional Audit Problems

Annual bias audits cost £50,000+. Manual data collection. External consultant fees. Months of preparation time.

Reactive compliance creates vulnerability. Problems discovered after damage done. Limited ability to correct course quickly.

Manual processes don't scale. Single point snapshots. No real-time bias detection. Inconsistent methodology application.

TalentMatched Innovation

Cyclical bias audits provides continuous monitoring. Real-time bias detection across protected characteristics.

Patent-protected Symmetrical Vector Bias Engine (SBVE) eliminates bias at source through mathematical symmetry.

Automated report generation and public posting. Proactive bias correction recommendations.

NYC Local Law 144

  • Monthly audits exceed annual requirement
  • Independent third-party validation
  • Automated public posting with detailed methodology
  • Complete protection against NYC violations
  • Impact ratio analysis for protected groups

EU AI Act Compliance

  • Continuous risk assessment throughout AI lifecycle
  • Bias monitoring integrated into system design
  • Mathematical proof of fairness measures
  • Regular third-party validation reports
  • Technical documentation excellence

Global State Compliance

  • California Civil Rights Council requirements
  • Virginia VCDPA algorithmic impact assessments
  • Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Florida standards
  • International PIPEDA, Privacy Act coverage
  • Multi-jurisdiction bias testing coordination

SBVE Technology

  • Bias effects cancel through mathematical symmetry
  • Protected characteristic exclusion from vectors
  • Continuous validation of neutral outcomes
  • Real-time bias detection and immediate alerts
  • Mathematical fairness proof generation

Cost Reduction

Eliminate external audit fees. Reduce manual compliance administration. Prevent penalty exposure through early detection.

Mathematical Proof

Patent-protected bias neutrality demonstration. Objective fairness validation. Expert witness quality reporting capability.

Continuous Monitoring

Every decision tracked for bias indicators. Immediate alerts for statistical anomalies. Proactive prevention measures.

Smart Human Oversight

Intelligent escalation balancing efficiency with regulatory compliance - 40% time savings with 100% legal protection

▼

The Oversight Dilemma

Too much review kills efficiency. Recruiters drowning in obvious decisions. 40% of time wasted on administrative tasks.

Too little review violates regulations. GDPR Article 22 violations for automated decisions. EU AI Act requirements for meaningful supervision.

Industry problem: No middle ground solution exists. Traditional systems force impossible choice between speed and compliance.

Intelligent Solution

Smart escalation: Humans review when needed, AI handles obvious decisions with confidence.

SBVE identifies inconsistent vector correlations. Automatic escalation for ambiguous cases. Dashboard grouping for efficient review.

40% time savings with 100% compliance. Meaningful oversight without efficiency loss. Patent-protected intelligence.

GDPR Article 22 Safeguards

  • Human intervention available on-demand for any decision
  • Candidate portal enables representation submission
  • Formal appeal process with human review
  • Genuine human discretion to override AI recommendations
  • Complete audit trail of human involvement

EU AI Act Human Oversight

  • Real-time intervention capability dashboard
  • Clear AI confidence scoring transparency
  • Transparent uncertainty indicators
  • Built-in guidance for human reviewers
  • Training integration for oversight competency

US State Compliance

  • NYC: Human review before rejection decisions
  • California: Mandatory human oversight documentation
  • Multi-state: Right to opt-out of automated profiling
  • Documentation of meaningful human involvement
  • Appeal escalation for contested decisions

Escalation Engine

  • Vector correlation confidence scoring
  • Automatic escalation for low-confidence decisions
  • Dashboard grouping for efficient batch review
  • Quality assurance integration and tracking
  • Performance monitoring and optimization

40% Time Optimization

Reduction in unnecessary human review tasks. Focused attention on genuinely complex decisions. Automated routine handling.

Complete Article 22 Compliance

No solely automated candidate decisions. Meaningful human oversight verification. Comprehensive appeal mechanisms.

Technology Leadership

Patent-protected intelligent escalation algorithms. Superior human-AI collaboration. Industry-leading efficiency gains.

Universal Candidate Portal

Self-service rights management across all 9 jurisdictions with automated compliance and zero administrative burden

▼

Data Rights Challenge

Nine jurisdictions, dozens of rights, one impossible administrative task for HR teams.

GDPR access requests taking weeks to fulfill manually. Individual email responses to deletion requests. Inconsistent rights application.

Legal risk exposure up to €20 million for violations. Administrative nightmare consuming HR resources. Candidate dissatisfaction.

Universal Solution

Single portal handles all global data rights instantly. Candidate access to personal information in real-time.

Automated compliance across 9 jurisdictions. Zero administrative burden for clients. Future-proof regulatory adaptation.

Every major data protection law covered. Enhanced candidate experience. Professional compliance management.

GDPR Rights (Articles 15-22)

  • Right of Access: Complete application history viewing
  • Right to Rectification: Self-service profile updates
  • Right to Erasure: Complete profile deletion capability
  • Right to Data Portability: Structured data exports
  • Right to Object: Automated processing opt-out

US State Law Rights

  • California CPRA: Consumer access and correction rights
  • Virginia VCDPA: Data portability and opt-out capabilities
  • Colorado CPA: Automated decision-making opt-out
  • Connecticut, Utah, Florida: State-specific rights
  • Non-discrimination for rights exercise

International Compliance

  • Canada PIPEDA: Access and correction rights
  • Australia: Privacy Principles compliance
  • Brazil LGPD: Nine data subject rights
  • Singapore, South Africa, New Zealand coverage
  • Real-time compliance across all jurisdictions

Portal Features

  • Complete application timeline viewing
  • AI assessment reasoning transparency
  • Self-service profile and preference management
  • Granular consent and privacy controls
  • Multi-language support and localization

Zero HR Burden

Self-service candidate management eliminates manual processing. Automated response generation. Streamlined compliance.

Instant Compliance

Real-time rights fulfillment. Automatic legal requirement satisfaction. Continuous compliance monitoring and verification.

Enhanced Experience

Complete data visibility and control. Professional compliance management. Enhanced candidate satisfaction and trust.

Cross-Border Data Protection

Automated adequacy verification and transfer management with real-time safeguard implementation

▼

Global Transfer Challenge

Candidates from multiple countries. Hiring managers across different jurisdictions. Conflicting international data protection laws.

Manual adequacy decision verification. Complex Standard Contractual Clauses implementation. Transfer restriction compliance risks.

€20 million GDPR fines for inadequate transfers. Legal uncertainty paralyzing international recruitment operations.

Comprehensive Protection

Automated global data protection with intelligent transfer management. Real-time adequacy verification across jurisdictions.

Jurisdiction-specific safeguard implementation. Complete transparency for candidates and clients throughout process.

SBVE maintains protection throughout global processing. Mathematical verification of transfer adequacy and security.

GDPR Transfer Requirements

  • Adequacy Decisions: Automatic Commission verification
  • Standard Contractual Clauses: Pre-approved implementation
  • Binding Corporate Rules: Integration framework support
  • Derogations: Explicit consent collection where required
  • Transfer impact assessment automation

International Frameworks

  • Canada PIPEDA: Cross-border disclosure notification
  • Australia APP 8: Overseas disclosure compliance
  • Brazil LGPD: International transfer adequacy
  • Singapore PDPA: Overseas transfer requirements
  • Multi-jurisdiction coordination and compliance

US State Compliance

  • California CPRA: Third country transfer disclosure
  • Multi-state: International transfer transparency
  • Data subject rights preservation across borders
  • Adequate safeguard implementation verification
  • Cross-border audit trail maintenance

Technical Implementation

  • Automatic location analysis and risk detection
  • Real-time adequacy decision verification
  • Dynamic safeguard implementation protocols
  • SBVE cross-border protection maintenance
  • Comprehensive transfer documentation

Automated Protection

Real-time adequacy verification systems. Automatic safeguard deployment. Transfer violation prevention mechanisms.

Global Scalability

International expansion support capabilities. Scalable transfer management. Consistent protection standards worldwide.

Complete Documentation

Every transfer logged and documented. Regulatory reporting automation. Comprehensive audit preparation materials.

Enterprise-Grade Security

Military-grade defense-in-depth architecture with zero-trust security model and AES-256 encryption

▼

High-Stakes Data Protection

Personal information for thousands of candidates. Sensitive employment history and salary details. Biometric voice recordings.

Sophisticated cybercriminals targeting HR databases. State-sponsored actors seeking personal information. Insider threats from privileged access.

GDPR fines up to €20 million for security breaches. Mandatory 72-hour breach notifications. Reputational damage and client trust erosion.

Military-Grade Protection

Defense-in-depth security architecture with multi-layered protection systems. Zero-trust security model verification.

Patent-protected data processing security throughout SBVE operations. Encrypted vector calculations preventing data exposure.

24/7 security operations center monitoring. Enterprise-grade compliance management. Continuous threat detection and response.

GDPR Article 32 Compliance

  • State-of-the-art encryption implementation
  • Pseudonymization where applicable
  • Confidentiality assurance systems
  • Regular security testing and evaluation
  • Comprehensive staff security training

Advanced Encryption

  • AES-256 encryption for all stored data
  • TLS 1.3 encryption for all communications
  • Hardware security modules (HSMs) integration
  • End-to-end encryption for sensitive data flows
  • Memory encryption preventing data exposure

Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Mandatory 2FA for personal data access
  • Hardware token support (FIDO2/WebAuthn)
  • Risk-based adaptive authentication systems
  • Role-based access controls implementation
  • Comprehensive session management

Continuous Monitoring

  • 24/7 security operations center (SOC) monitoring
  • Advanced threat analytics with machine learning
  • User behavior analytics (UEBA) implementation
  • Automated incident response orchestration
  • Comprehensive audit trail collection

Zero-Trust Architecture

Verify every user and device before access. Continuous authentication throughout sessions. Least privilege enforcement.

Advanced Threat Detection

AI-powered security analytics. Behavioral analysis capabilities. Zero-day attack detection and automated response.

Business Continuity

Real-time data replication across regions. Automated disaster recovery procedures. RTO < 4 hours, RPO < 15 minutes.